.....................................Miss Moneybags is on the right.
http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2010/08/06/andalucia_malaga/1281082124.html Michell Obama Meets with Saudi Money Men in Spain. as reported by El Mundo 2nd Largest News Organization in Spain. Its in the last paragraph of the story:
El mismo medio también informó que Michelle Obama, mantendrá un encuentro con el príncipe Salman bin Abdelaziz, gobernador de Riad y hermano del fallecido Rey Fahd de Arabia Saudí, quien también está veraneando en Marbella. Por otro lado, también se baraja la posibilidad de que la esposa del presidente Obama, se reúna con Abdullah Al Thani, empresario multimillonario, propietario del Málaga CF e hijo del ministro del Interior de Qatar.
Translated it says:
Various royal houses (ie royal families) have spent their summers in Marbella for many years. There will be a meeting between Michelle Obama and Prince Salman bin Abdul Aziz, governor of Riyadh and brother of the late King Fahd of Saudi Arabia, meanwhile another meeting is shuffled(? this is the only translation I can find for 'barajar') ith the first lady with the owner of Málaga CF, billionaire businessman, son of Qatar's Interior Minister and member of the Qatari royal family, Abdullah Al Thani.
With the US media focused on the extravagance of her vacation, the real story may be here.
Whats up? Why is she meeting with these people? One scenario is to launder illegal foreign campaign contributions and ship them back into the US using Airforce 2: guaranteed not to be searched by any entity. After all, Democrats in trouble are gonna need all the cash they can get this year.
This is nothing new. Obama received millions in illegal foreign (muslim) donations in his campaign. Palestinians worked in illegal phone banks calling US voters during the election.
The Clintons proved corruption and Democrats go hand in hand. The Obamas are merely continuing the legacy of corruption.
Do you disagree? Or have an alternative motive for this meeting? send me a comment, and if its free of venom and profanity I'll post it.
Sunday, August 8, 2010
Friday, May 7, 2010
Cher's offspring Chaz Bono is officially a man after he changed his name and gender in court yesterday.
Bono, who was born a girl named Chastity, is now legally recognised as a male, a year after undergoing a sex change.
The 41-year-old, whose father was the late singer and politician Sonny Bono, beamed with happiness as he left Santa Monica courthouse.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1274006/Chers-gender-swap-son-Chaz-Bono-officially-man.html#ixzz0nIc3XK3B
Nope, this is not a man. She will never be anything more than a mutilated woman.
Above we see startling reality. As a woman, she is beautiful, and a man she is a failure.
Doesn't matter what operations or legal maneuvers a person jumps through. Mutilation can never change the truth. Never, ever. Homosexuality is a mental illness. Chaz will never be a man. She will live a lie the rest of her life.
Click on my archive to see what the Bible really has to say about homosexuality.
Monday, March 22, 2010
A misguided friend asked me this question. He though the health care bill would help the poor. Needless to say, my friend doesn't watch the news and is ignorant of what is really in the bill. This is my answer:
[B]Did Jesus teach socialism? [/B]
No. Jesus [U]never[/U] taught socialism. Socialism is about extreme govt control of everything.
Jesus did not come to preach govt control, nor did he ever speak about how evil corporations were.
Jesus was never a community organizer.
Jesus is not a liberal or a conservative.
Jesus is not a revolutionary. Jesus was not concerned about how men govern themselves.
When asked a political question about paying taxes, Jesus responded, "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's. Give to God what is God's."
Jesus did NOT come here to deliver men from government, He came here to deliver us from sin.
There are those who point to liberal talking points about helping the poor and say, "Look Jesus is liberal, we both want to help the poor!" (notice they are silent about killing babies)
Jesus taught us to care for the poor by GIVING to them, not by an all powerful govt taking away money at sword point from some and redistributing that money to others.
What about the health care bill? Wouldn't Jesus want people to have health care?
Sure, but they are NOT getting health care. The elderly are denied care in this bill.
Physicians are required to discuss the benefits of suicide to retired people every five years.
[U]--->Tell me...is that what Jesus would want?[/U] The physicians won't come out and say, you are denied for a life saving surgery. they will just put the elderly on a waiting list and just wait for them to die.
This IS socialism. Its not of Christ. Its not what Jesus would do. Its what satan would do.
Likewise, its expensive to treat cancer. [B]Socialism puts people on a waiting list and allows them to die. THIS IS RATIONING. Another word for it is [U]murder.[/U][/B]
This IS socialism.
Denied as well will be the mentally infirm. The population of retarded men and women in this country will be denied health care...[U]murdered by the socialist state.[/U]
Socialism lies to the people. "It's not denial of care, its a waiting list."
Jesus does NOT lie.
This bill is NOT what Jesus would want for the people.
[B]Please do NOT confuse socialism with the words of Jesus. Thank you.[/B]
Sunday, March 21, 2010
If you are elderly you will be denied care. They won't say denial, it will be called a "waiting list." A needed life saving surgery will be put on a five year waiting list. Sure you will die if you don't get the operation in 6 months, but thems the breaks.
Oh and every five years during your retirement, you will be asked to commit suicide. I'm expecting forged signatures will be commonplace.
It will be the same if you know someone who is mentally handicapped, they will be denied care...they don't contribute to society, so they are too expensive to spend scarce health care dollars on.
If you have an expensive condition, like cancer...you will die. There may be life saving procedures available, but you won't get them. Its cheaper for you to die.
The bottom line is this: If this health care bill is so great, why did congress exempt themselves from it? Yes they and their families will get better care than you will.